Agenda item
Applications for Development
Purpose:
To consider applications for development, details of which are set out in the attached schedule.
Recommendation:
That the applications be determined in accordance with the recommendations of the Business Manager – Development Management.
|
Page |
Application No. |
Address |
Planning Officer |
|
13 – 21 |
21/01213/FUL |
Plough Inn Black Bourton Road, Clanfield
|
Elloise Street |
|
22 – 27 |
22/02135/LBC |
The Double Red Duke Black Bourton Road, Clanfield |
Elloise Street |
|
28 - 33 |
22/02136/ADV |
The Double Red Duke Black Bourton Road, Clanfield |
Elloise Street |
Minutes:
21/01213/FUL Plough Inn, Black Bourton Road, Clanfield
David Ditchett, Principal Planner, presented the application for erection of timber shed to be used as an office, Indian sandstone pathway and vertical boarded bin store enclosure (part retrospective). The bin cladding should be vertical – no objection from conservation officer. The Principal Planner highlighted the typo on condition 3. and advised on the amendment 120 – G27. The Chair highlighted the time frame on condition 2. The Principal Planner confirmed the time frames have been shortened to enable the application to be completed promptly.
The Committee asked for confirmation on the shed staying. The Principal Planner confirmed that the shed would remain with new cladding and roof. The planner confirmed that parking was not being assessed as part of the application when asked about the number of parking spaces. The Committee asked about screening for the grade 1 listed church. The Principal Planner confirmed that the trees are a natural screen to the Church.
Councillor Fenton proposed and Councillor Nicholls seconded that the application be approved. Vote was unanimous.
Committee resolved to approve the application with condition 3 varied to read A sample of the vertical larch cladding to be used on elevations A, B and C shown on plan number 120-G27 Rev F shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for approval within 12 months of the date of this decision. The development shall be constructed in the approved materials and retained as such thereafter.
REASON: To safeguard the character and appearance of the area.
22/02135/LBC The Double Red Duke, Black Bourton Road, Clanfield.
David Ditchett, Principal Planner, presented the application for external alterations to erect a double sided hanging sign with linolites, along with the addition of an internally illuminated menu case and small cut panel with printed detail. The application for advertising consent and listed building consent was previously refused in whole for the reason of harm to listed building. The Applicant had appealed the decision. The inspector had allowed the internally illuminated menu sign and the small sign which both have planning permission. The inspector did not allow the hanging sign based on the brightness of colour. The Conservation Officer had not objected to this application. The Principal Planner read out the relevant paragraphs of the appeal decision.
The Committed had a discussion regarding the design of the sign, focusing on the colour of the sign, how it impacted the building and surrounding and considered if the colour of the sign would weather with time.
Councillor Fenton proposed refusal of application and Councillor Alaric Smith seconded.
The proposal was put to the vote; 3 votes to refuse 5 votes against refusal 3 abstentions.
Councillor Goodwin proposed approval and Councillor Maynard seconded.
The proposal was put to the vote; 5 votes to approve, 3 votes against approval and 3 abstentions.
Councillors Fenton and Smith voted against approval of the application.
Committee resolved to approve the application in line with officers recommendations.
22/02136/ADV The Double Red Duke, Black Bourton Road, Clanfield.
David Ditchett, Principal Planner, presented the application for erection of a double sided hanging linolites, along with the addition of an internally illuminated menu case and small cut panel with painted detail. The Principal Planner explained the reason the application had come before the Committee was in interest of consistency.
Councillor Maynard proposed approval and Councillor Goodwin seconded.
The proposal was put to the vote; 6 votes to approve, 3 votes against and 2 abstentions.
Councillors Fenton and Smith voted against the approval of the application.
Committee resolved to approve the application in line with officers recommendations.
Supporting documents:
PDF 248 KB