Issue - meetings
West Oxfordshire Nature Recovery Plan
Meeting: 04/02/2026 - Overview and Scrutiny Committee (Item 91)
91 West Oxfordshire Nature Recovery Plan 
PDF 240 KB
Purpose
To provide a progress update on the delivery of the Council’s Nature Recovery Plan (2024 – 2030) and an outline of the requirement to publish a report on the implementation of the Council’s statutory biodiversity duty for the reporting period 12th February 2024 to 1st January 2026.
Recommendation
That Overview and Scrutiny Committee resolves to:
1. Note the progress made in delivering the Nature Recovery Plan (2024 – 2030); and
2. Note the requirement to publish a report on the Council’s implementation of the statutory biodiversity duty within 12 weeks of the end of the reporting period (26th March 2026).
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Councillor Andrew Prosser, Executive Member for Climate Action and Nature Recovery, presented the item to the Committee, the purpose of which was to provide a progress update on the delivery of the Council’s Nature Recovery Plan (2024 – 2030) and an outline of the requirement to publish a report on the implementation of the Council’s statutory biodiversity duty for the reporting period 12 February 2024 to 1 January 2026. Councillor Prosser advised that the Nature Recovery Plan had three themes which could be seen at section 2.3 of the report.
In the discussion the following was discussed:
- The Committee explored the likely impact of the Infrastructure Planning Bill on the Nature Recovery Plan. It was noted that the impacts of this were not yet known as secondary legislation was still awaited. Further, it was the intention that the Nature Recovery Plan would apply to a broader area than planning alone and included Council owned land and policies.
- Members suggested that the report should show more clearly how the investment and officer work was resulting in outcomes that were measurable. It was suggested that it may be beneficial for targets and KPI’s to be set on an annual basis, with an eventual ten-year review, so that the impacts of the work could be seen. The officers advised that there was an action tracker with some KPI’s and that this could be included in future reports. A Member also suggested that fewer work streams with key deliverables could be beneficial for reporting and more focused work.
- It was noted that the report did not feature a sewerage map, this was seen as an important area of action, and it was suggested that this could be included.
- The Committee considered targets for the use of glyphosate and questioned how its use was tracked. It was suggested that there were challenges in obtaining data to monitor the historic and current use of glyphosate. The Executive Member noted that the target for its use was zero in 2026 but noted exceptions to this for cases of certain invasive species. The Principal Ecologist advised that the Council’s Woodgreen offices had been trialling zero glyphosate use for the past year which could be expanded. It was proposed that a policy on glyphosate use should be created.
- The Council’s engagement with Town and Parish Councils on the plan was explored. Efforts to engage had seen disappointing results and officers were considering meeting in person with representatives as a potential next step. It was suggested that the varying levels of expertise and resource at Town and Parish Councils may have been a barrier to implementing aspects of nature recovery. Members were encouraged to advise Parish and Town Councils that the Council did fund organisations, such as Wild Oxfordshire, to give support in this area and to contact officers for information.
- Within new housing developments it was suggested that Management Companies did not undertake the required biodiversity work that was promised. Solutions to this issue were explored. Officers suggested that ... view the full minutes text for item 91